improve blood sugar without cutting calories

improve blood sugar without cutting calories

Shocking Truth: You Can Stabilize Blood Sugar Without Dieting!

improve blood sugar without cutting calories

Scientists Find Easy Method to Control Blood Sugar Without Reducing Calories

A randomized crossover study demonstrates that the benefits of a 16-hour fasting regimen become noticeable within just three days, without the necessity of caloric restriction.

Impact of Eating Window

Limiting the eating period to 8 hours daily substantially enhanced blood glucose regulation in individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes, irrespective of whether this window was set earlier or later in the day. This conclusion emerged from a randomized crossover trial presented at the Annual Meeting of The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) held in Madrid from September 9 to 13.

improve blood sugar without cutting calories: Study Findings

Dr. Kelly Bowden Davies of Manchester Metropolitan University, the study’s lead author, stated, “Our research indicates that confining eating to an 8-hour window per day markedly improved the amount of time spent in the normal blood glucose range and diminished blood glucose fluctuations. Nonetheless, shifting this 8-hour eating window to earlier or later in the day did not provide additional advantages.”

Dr. Davies emphasized that the observed benefits were linked to the 16-hour fasting period rather than the timing of meals or changes in caloric intake.

She noted, “Our results underscore that the benefits of time-restricted eating are evident within just three days. While time-restricted eating is gaining popularity, no previous studies have investigated the impact of strictly controlled diet with varying eating windows on glycemic control in individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes.”

Research Context

Existing research suggests that time-restricted eating (TRE), which regulates the timing of food consumption without altering what is consumed, can enhance insulin sensitivity and reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in those at risk for type 2 diabetes.

However, the effects on glycemic variability—fluctuations in blood glucose—remain ambiguous, with prior studies attributing positive outcomes to reduced caloric intake. This study aimed to explore the effects of meal timing while maintaining energy balance.

improve blood sugar without cutting calories: Methodology

The research examined the impact of TRE in a eucaloric context, where diets were tailored to meet energy needs based on individual factors such as sex, age, weight, height, and activity level. Participants were assigned to either an early time-restricted eating (ETRE; between 8:00 and 16:00) or a late time-restricted eating (LTRE; between 12:00 and 20:00) regimen, with both compared to their habitual eating patterns (over 14 hours per day).

A standardized eucaloric diet (50% carbohydrates, 30% fat, and 20% protein) was provided during the TRE phases, while participants followed their own diets during habitual eating periods.

Results

Continuous glucose monitoring assessed daily time spent in euglycemia (normal blood glucose levels of 3.9-7.8 mmol/l) and markers of glycemic variability, including mean absolute glucose (MAG), coefficient of variation (CV), and mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE).

Analysis revealed that TRE (8 hours/day) significantly increased the duration of normal blood glucose levels by an average of 3.3% compared to habitual eating (over 14 hours/day) and reduced glycemic variability—MAG decreased by 0.6 mmol/l, CV by 2.6%, and MAGE by 0.4 mmol/l.

Conclusion

However, no significant differences in glycemic control were observed between the ETRE and LTRE regimens.

Dr. Bowden Davies concluded, “While many individuals struggle to adhere to calorie counting in the long term, our study suggests that focusing on meal timing could be a straightforward method to enhance blood sugar control in individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes, regardless of the specific 8-hour eating window. This approach warrants further investigation in larger and long-term studies.”

Leave a Comment